MerLean-example

28 Cor 1: Alon–Chung Contrapositive

Definition 323 Incident Vertices

Let \(E \subseteq X_1\) be a set of edges in a simple graph \(G\) on vertex type \(V\). The set of vertices incident to \(E\) is defined as

\[ \Gamma (E) \; =\; \{ v \in V \mid \exists \, e \in E,\; v \in e\} . \]

That is, \(\Gamma (E)\) consists of all vertices that appear as an endpoint of some edge in \(E\).

Lemma 324 Membership in Incident Vertices

For any edge set \(E\) and vertex \(v\),

\[ v \in \Gamma (E) \; \Longleftrightarrow \; \exists \, e \in E,\; v \in e. \]
Proof

This holds by unfolding the definition of \(\Gamma (E)\) and simplifying.

Lemma 325 Incident Vertices Nonempty

If \(E\) is a set of edges such that some edge in \(E\) has a vertex, then \(\Gamma (E)\) is nonempty.

Proof

Suppose there exists \(e \in E\) and \(v \in e\). We obtain \(e\), \(v\), and the membership proof. By the membership characterization of \(\Gamma (E)\), \(v \in \Gamma (E)\), so \(\Gamma (E)\) is nonempty.

Lemma 326 Edges Contained in Induced Edges of Incident Vertices

Let \(G\) be a simple graph and \(E \subseteq \operatorname {edgeFinset}(G)\). Then

\[ E \; \subseteq \; \operatorname {inducedEdges}(G,\, \Gamma (E)). \]
Proof

Let \(e \in E\) be arbitrary. We must show \(e \in \operatorname {inducedEdges}(G, \Gamma (E))\). Rewriting via the membership criterion for \(\operatorname {inducedEdges}\), we need: (1) \(e \in \operatorname {edgeFinset}(G)\), which holds since \(e \in E \subseteq \operatorname {edgeFinset}(G)\); and (2) every vertex \(v \in e\) lies in \(\Gamma (E)\). For any such \(v\), rewriting via the membership criterion for \(\Gamma (E)\), we exhibit \(e \in E\) and \(v \in e\), establishing \(v \in \Gamma (E)\).

Lemma 327 Monotonicity of the Alon–Chung Bound Function

Let \(c \in \mathbb {R}\) with \(0 \leq c \leq 1\), and let \(0 \leq a \leq b\). Then

\[ a^2 + c \cdot a \cdot (1 - a) \; \leq \; b^2 + c \cdot b \cdot (1 - b). \]
Proof

Define \(f(t) = t^2 + c \cdot t(1-t) = (1-c)t^2 + ct\). Then

\[ f(b) - f(a) = (1-c)(b^2 - a^2) + c(b - a) = (b - a)\bigl[(1-c)(b+a) + c\bigr]. \]

Since \(b \geq a \geq 0\) and \(0 \leq c \leq 1\), we have \(b - a \geq 0\), \((1-c) \geq 0\), \(b + a \geq 0\), and \(c \geq 0\), so \((b-a)[(1-c)(b+a)+c] \geq 0\). This is verified by nonlinear arithmetic using \(a^2 \geq 0\), \(b^2 \geq 0\), \((b-a)^2 \geq 0\), and the nonnegativity of \((b-a)\cdot [(1-c)(b+a)+c]\).

Let \(G\) be a \(s\)-regular simple graph on \(V\) with \(|V| \geq 2\) and \(s \geq 1\). Let \(\lambda _2\) denote the second-largest adjacency eigenvalue of \(G\) with \(\lambda _2 \geq 0\). Let \(E \subseteq \operatorname {edgeFinset}(G)\) and \(0 {\lt} \gamma {\lt} 1\). If

\[ |\Gamma (E)| \; \leq \; \gamma \cdot |V|, \]

then

\[ |E| \; \leq \; \left(\gamma ^2 + \frac{\lambda _2}{s}\, \gamma (1-\gamma )\right) |\operatorname {edgeFinset}(G)|. \]
Proof

Let \(S = \Gamma (E)\). We consider two cases.

Case 1: \(S = \emptyset \). We claim \(E = \emptyset \). Indeed, suppose for contradiction that \(E\) is nonempty; pick \(e \in E\). Since \(e \in \operatorname {edgeFinset}(G)\), writing \(e = s(v,w)\) via the induction principle for \(\operatorname {Sym2}\), we have \(v \in S\) by definition of \(\Gamma (E)\) (since \(v \in e \in E\)), contradicting \(S = \emptyset \). Thus \(|E| = 0 \leq \alpha \cdot |\operatorname {edgeFinset}(G)|\), where \(\alpha = \gamma ^2 + (\lambda _2/s)\gamma (1-\gamma ) \geq 0\) (since \(\lambda _2/s \geq 0\), \(\gamma {\gt} 0\), and \(1 - \gamma {\gt} 0\), this follows by nonlinear arithmetic).

Case 2: \(S \neq \emptyset \). Set \(n = |V|\) and \(\gamma ' = |S|/n\). Then \(\gamma ' {\gt} 0\) (since \(S\) is nonempty and \(n {\gt} 0\)) and \(\gamma ' \leq \gamma \) (from the hypothesis \(|S| \leq \gamma n\)). Moreover, \(|S| {\lt} |V|\): if \(|S| \geq |V|\), then \(|V| \leq |S| \leq \gamma |V|\), giving \(1 \leq \gamma \), contradicting \(\gamma {\lt} 1\).

By Lemma 326, \(E \subseteq \operatorname {inducedEdges}(G, S)\), so \(|E| \leq |\operatorname {inducedEdges}(G,S)|\).

Applying the Alon–Chung theorem (Theorem 322) to \(S\):

\[ |\operatorname {inducedEdges}(G,S)| \; \leq \; \alpha ' \cdot |\operatorname {edgeFinset}(G)|, \]

where \(\alpha ' = {\gamma ’}^2 + (\lambda _2/s)\, \gamma '(1-\gamma ')\).

We verify \(\lambda _2/s \leq 1\): by Lemma 316, the largest eigenvalue equals \(s\), and by antitonicity of adjacency eigenvalues (Theorem 241), \(\lambda _2 \leq s\), so \(\lambda _2/s \leq 1\).

By Lemma 327 applied with \(c = \lambda _2/s \in [0,1]\) and \(0 {\lt} \gamma ' \leq \gamma \), we obtain \(\alpha ' \leq \alpha = \gamma ^2 + (\lambda _2/s)\gamma (1-\gamma )\).

Combining via a calculation:

\[ |E| \; \leq \; |\operatorname {inducedEdges}(G,S)| \; \leq \; \alpha ' \cdot |\operatorname {edgeFinset}(G)| \; \leq \; \alpha \cdot |\operatorname {edgeFinset}(G)|, \]

where the last step uses \(\alpha ' \leq \alpha \) and \(|\operatorname {edgeFinset}(G)| \geq 0\).

Let \(G\) be a \(s\)-regular simple graph on \(V\) with \(|V| \geq 2\) and \(s \geq 1\). Let \(\lambda _2 \geq 0\) be the second-largest adjacency eigenvalue. Let \(E \subseteq \operatorname {edgeFinset}(G)\) and \(0 {\lt} \gamma {\lt} 1\). Set \(\alpha = \gamma ^2 + \tfrac {\lambda _2}{s}\, \gamma (1-\gamma )\). If

\[ |E| \; {\gt}\; \alpha \cdot |\operatorname {edgeFinset}(G)|, \]

then

\[ |\Gamma (E)| \; {\gt}\; \gamma \cdot |V|. \]

In other words, if \(E\) is a large fraction of edges, then \(E\) is incident to many vertices.

Proof

We argue by contradiction. Suppose \(|\Gamma (E)| \leq \gamma \cdot |V|\). Then by Theorem 328, we have \(|E| \leq \alpha \cdot |\operatorname {edgeFinset}(G)|\). This contradicts the hypothesis \(|E| {\gt} \alpha \cdot |\operatorname {edgeFinset}(G)|\), so by linear arithmetic we obtain a contradiction. Therefore \(|\Gamma (E)| {\gt} \gamma \cdot |V|\).